The Pros of Solar Panels on Farmland
Economic Benefits and Stable Income
Leasing farmland for utility-scale solar projects can provide a reliable income stream, often far exceeding traditional agricultural rental rates. In the Midwest, solar developers typically offer $800–$2,000 per acre annually for 20–35-year leases, compared to average farmland rental rates of $200–$400 per acre in states like Iowa and Illinois.
The Purdue Ag Economy Barometer (June 2024) found that 16% of surveyed farmers had discussed solar leasing, with 69% offered over $1,000 per acre. Owning a solar system for on-farm use can also cut electricity costs.
Environmental and Soil Benefits
Solar farms can align with sustainable farming goals. Studies from Oregon State University show that solar panels on farmland retain more soil moisture and create a cooling effect, enhancing panel efficiency and potentially benefiting shade-tolerant crops or grazing livestock. Agrivoltaics—co-locating solar panels with agriculture—can boost crop yields for shade-resistant plants like leafy greens or berries, with some crops yielding 20% more under panels than in full sun. Grazing sheep under panels, common in the Midwest, reduces maintenance costs for solar operators while preserving agricultural use. A 2021 study found that soil under solar panels had higher nitrogen and carbon content, suggesting improved soil health when managed properly.
Energy and Climate Impact
Solar panels produce zero-emission electricity, offsetting more carbon per acre than tree planting. With climate change projected to reduce Midwest farmland quality by 2050, solar energy can mitigate environmental degradation while providing energy independence. An Oregon State study estimates that covering just 1% of global farmland with solar panels could meet worldwide electricity demand, highlighting their efficiency. In the Midwest, where 70% of solar farms are sited on cropland, this dual use supports both energy and food security.
Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
Well-managed solar farms can enhance biodiversity. Research from the UK Energy Research Centre shows that solar sites with native vegetation or wildflower meadows boost pollinator populations, benefiting nearby crops. In the Midwest, integrating pollinator-friendly plants under panels can support bees and butterflies, improving soil health and reducing erosion.
The Cons of Solar Panels on Farmland
Loss of Agricultural Land
The primary concern is the potential loss of productive farmland. The American Farmland Trust estimates that 83% of U.S. solar development will occur on agricultural land, with 49% on highly productive soils. In the Midwest, where 43% of solar farms from 2009–2020 were built on cropland, this could impact food security. Once converted to solar, land may not easily return to agriculture due to infrastructure like concrete footings or zinc leaching from galvanized metal, which can degrade soil quality. In Virginia, for example, 2,000 acres of farmland were lost weekly to development, including solar, in 2021.
High Initial Costs and Risks
For farmers investing in their own systems, upfront costs are substantial. A 100 kW system’s $114,147 post-incentive cost remains a significant barrier, especially for smaller operations. Leasing land carries risks, too. If a solar company abandons a project, landowners may face decommissioning costs or land restoration challenges. Only 10% of decommissioned panels are recycled, raising concerns about waste management.
Operational and Aesthetic Challenges
Solar farms can disrupt farming operations. Panels limit tractor access, making row crops like corn or soybeans impractical without agrivoltaic designs that raise panels higher (increasing costs). Aesthetic concerns also arise, with some communities viewing solar arrays as industrializing rural landscapes. A UK study found that 19% of respondents opposed solar farms due to visual impacts, particularly among older residents. In the Midwest, similar sentiments fuel resistance, with farmers feeling “priced out” as land values rise.
Environmental and Regulatory Concerns
Poor construction practices can lead to soil erosion and stormwater runoff, violating regulations like the Clean Water Act. A 2021 Mediterranean study found that solar farm construction impacts soil similarly to abandoning farmland, emphasizing the need for careful management. Regulatory inconsistencies across Midwest states, such as varying stormwater guidelines, add complexity. Additionally, large-scale projects may harm local wildlife, like bats, by disrupting foraging habitats.
Agrivoltaics: A Middle Ground
Agrivoltaics offers a compromise, allowing farmers to maintain agricultural production while generating solar energy. Cornell University research in New York shows that crops like strawberries and grapes can thrive under panels, with some vineyards benefiting from semi-transparent perovskite panels. In the Midwest, where flat terrain suits both farming and solar, agrivoltaics could preserve land use. However, it requires careful planning—higher panel mounts and spacing reduce solar density, impacting energy output or crop yields by about 30%.
Making the Decision
Before signing a lease or investing, consider:
Lease Terms: Ensure decommissioning clauses protect your land’s future use. Consult a lawyer who has dealt with solar leases before.
Soil Health: Opt for agrivoltaic designs or vegetation management to minimize degradation.
Community Impact: Engage neighbors to address aesthetic or economic concerns.
Financials: Compare solar lease payments ($800–$2,000/acre) to crop revenue ($200–$400/acre) and factor in tax implications. Panels also impact property values.
For more information, visit the U.S. Department of Energy’s Farmer’s Guide to Going Solar (www.energy.gov) (www.energy.gov) or contact local extension services.
Heard on X
